Wheeling
Jesuit University
How
Do I Write an Introduction and Conclusion?
Since it is a paragraph (see ARC handout on paragraphs),
the introduction ought to include a topic sentence. Yet this topic sentence ought to be a more general topic
sentence, something that introduces the topic of your PAPER rather than simply
the specific paragraph.
In
an example/illustration paper about roommates, a good opening topic sentence
might look something like this:
“Everyone seems to have a story about the college roommate from hell” or
“The roommate one is assigned in college has a lot to say about the kind of
collegiate experience one will have.”
These statements sound almost like thesis statements, but they’re too
general. Yet both contain a germ of the
eventual thesis, while introducing the topic of your paper.
ü The
introduction also ought to indicate, either in a subtle way or more directly,
the compositional form you will use in your paper. Often the construction of a thesis will imply this information,
and this is usually enough. (In a comparison/contrast paper, for
instance, the thesis ought to include a comparison: “better than”, “more
significant”, etc.).
ü The
introduction must also include a thesis.
(See ARC handout on Thesis Statement for more information).
How long should the introduction be?
ü
There is no science to the length of an
introduction.
ü
For long papers, such as theses that many juniors
and seniors are required to write, an introduction typically cannot be
accomplished in a single paragraph and may continue for 2-3 pages.
ü
In a standard college composition of 3-5 pages,
however, a single paragraph is usually adequate to the task of introducing the material.
ü
Remember that most professors abhor one-sentence
paragraphs, so avoid them except for carefully calculated rhetorical effect or
unless specifically instructed to otherwise by your professor (not likely, yet not impossible).
ü
If you find your introduction going onto a second
page, you have probably gone too long.
There is very little chance that all of what you have written belongs in
the introduction. The body of your
paper has probably begun without you knowing it.
You may be familiar
with the oversimplified but essentially true dictum that in composition, the
introduction is where you state your thesis, the body is where you expound upon
your thesis, and the conclusion is where you restate your thesis—but this is an
oversimplification. To summarize in a
conclusion is not enough. Unless
specifically assigned to close your paper with a “summary” rather than a
“conclusion,” you ought not end your paper by summarizing what you have already
said.
ü
Remember that a proper conclusion is not merely a
summary. Otherwise it would be called…a
summary, not a conclusion. The
conclusion does indeed require a return to the thesis, but a good conclusion
requires more:
ü
A conclusion ought to draw some conclusion
about the topic of the paper.
ü
Some professors refer to this as the significance
of your paper (every paper
ought to have significance beyond the fact that you’ve been assigned a paper
and must write it or else face the consequences). Other professors refer to the significance as the
answer to the question “So what?”
(Hopefully,
you’ll always have an answer to that question beyond the aforementioned
necessity of completing an assignment for a grade; See ARC handout on “What is a Thesis?” for more information.)
Creating a
Successful Conclusion for your Paper:
1. Devise a
transition from the body to the conclusion that doesn’t abuse the old, tired
clichés of composition.
ü
“Finally,” “In conclusion,” “To summarize,” and “In the
final analysis” should be last resorts if you have no other way of moving from
the body of your paragraph into the conclusion
ü
Conclusive language sounds like a conclusion, and often
needs no awkward signal word. If you’re
truly endeavoring to provide significance to your paper, you may be
providing all the transition you need.
ü The point
is, be aware of shifting from one part of the essay to another, and do it
smoothly. (See also “Transitions” in the
ARC handout on “Paragraphs”).
2.
Return to the thesis rather than re-stating the thesis. Both you and your reader should now have a
greater breadth of knowledge of your topic after experiencing your paper. So reflect greater knowledge in re-packaging
your thesis for the final time in the paper.
ü Even a
parrot can say the same words over again—Do not repeat or otherwise echo words
and phrases. (Do you like to read the
same words over and over? Then why make
your professor read the same words over and over?)
ü
Don’t restate the thesis.
Don’t even restate your major arguments. Rather, re-package them.
3.
Draw a conclusion—take some responsibility for the words you
just committed to paper. Reflect some
of the thought that went into the paper’s making.
ü
Whether your professor calls it the “significance” or the
“point” or the “meaning” or the “so what” of the paper, provide some framework
for a larger discussion of the issues you’ve addressed.
ü
Some helpful questions to ask when drawing your conclusion
include:
·
So what? What wisdom may be derived from your essay?
·
Where do we go from
here? Are there any further
implications beyond what your topic could explore?
4.
Don’t introduce new or unrelated ideas in the conclusion in
the name of drawing a conclusion or finding a larger significance in your
argument.
ü
Stay on the topic
ü
Introduce new material to support your argument only within
the body of your paper.
| Last Update: April 15, 2003 | [ Close Window ] |
Wheeling Jesuit University Wheeling, West Virginia |